Author’s note / Artificial intelligence, companionship, and care
Your Grandmother Is No Longer Alone (A Machine Keeps Her Company)
A voice on the bedside table can make a night feel less lonely. As I work on Coco, I keep wondering what we do with the time and peace of mind that companionship gives us back.
Imagine this scene. It is eleven at night, and Elsa, eighty-two, is telling a voice from a device on her bedside table about her day. Her grandson did not call. Her neighbor on the fifth floor is ill. Tomorrow she has to go to the bank, and she cannot be bothered. The voice asks about the neighbor. It remembers that Elsa mentioned her last week. Elsa laughs a couple of times before turning out the light.
Six hundred kilometers away, her daughter checks her phone before going to sleep. She receives a summary of what her mother chose to share: she went out in the morning, had lunch, and talked for a while that evening. Relieved, she puts the phone down. Whenever I imagine this scene, I find myself lingering on that last gesture.
I can see something beautiful in it. I can also see a problem. The same reassurance that helps a daughter sleep can quietly become a reason to put off her next call. I find it hard to separate those possibilities, because both strike me as deeply human.
Some older people spend much of their day without a conversation in which someone pays them real attention. They may run into people, take care of an errand, say hello to the building superintendent. But there is an enormous distance between exchanging a few words and feeling that someone cares about what you have to say.
That distance often grows slowly. A son lives far away. A granddaughter starts a job. The call we meant to make today gets pushed to tomorrow, then to the weekend. Obligations, travel, and exhaustion accumulate. We go on loving someone while the space they occupy in our calendar keeps shrinking.
I do not need to turn that into a statistic to find it troubling. It is enough to imagine a whole afternoon without anyone asking a question. Or wanting to share some trivial thing and keeping it to yourself because everyone must be busy at this hour. Some kinds of silence are very hard to see from the outside.
An available voice can make some of those hours easier. It can pick up an anecdote, suggest a conversation, listen to a story the family already knows by heart. I understand the relief of speaking without having to work out whether you are interrupting. The words “I don't want to be a bother” seem especially sad to me when they come from someone with so much to say.
I also want to be careful about mistaking that availability for flawless attention. Artificial intelligence can make mistakes, misunderstand, or respond in ways that do not help. A voice that sounds warm does not necessarily understand everything that is happening. Anyone speaking to it deserves to know clearly what it is and to choose whether they want it around.
I should explain where I am writing from: I am working on a project that sits right in the middle of this question. It is called Coco. It is a small desktop robot with artificial intelligence, and one of its modes is designed to provide companionship for older people. That makes this discussion very concrete for me. The doubts come up as we try to give the project its shape.
In our first trials, I was surprised by how naturally some older people began talking to it. They shared things, returned to a story, waited for a reply. Their families valued the possibility of getting some sense of how the day had gone for someone they loved and could not always visit.
That made me think hard about the line between companionship and surveillance. I want people to retain their privacy and decide what to share, even when their families are worried. An activity summary can offer context; it cannot establish that someone is well. And living alone should not mean that other people are entitled to know every conversation you have.
What interested me most in those early experiences was seeing how a conversation with the machine could lead to another conversation, this time with someone in the family. A detail made a better question possible. An anecdote found a second listener. These are small observations, still limited; they help me think about where I want to take the project, without pretending that such a large problem has been solved.
I imagine that daughter calling the next day and asking about the neighbor on the fifth floor. Her mother discovers that someone remembers something that matters to her. The call has somewhere to begin. Sometimes affection needs that small piece of information to move beyond an automatic “Everything okay?”
But I can imagine the other version, too. The daughter reads the summary, sees nothing new, and tells herself there is no need to call today either. Then she does it again. Without anyone making an explicit decision, the tool begins to occupy more space, and the family less.
It would be too convenient to attribute either outcome to the device. It would also be unfair to judge a family by its number of calls. Some people care for relatives from far away; others are exhausted; others do much more than anyone sees. Asking for help can be a serious act of care. What matters to me is the question we ask after that help arrives.
What do we do with the peace of mind it gives us back? Does it let us reach out with less anxiety, ask more thoughtful questions, enjoy some time together? Or do we use it to convince ourselves that everything has already been taken care of? The answer may change from one week to the next. That is why I think it is worth asking again.
As I work on Coco, I try to keep that uncertainty in view. The thought of someone having a less silent night excites me. I also want there to be reasons the next day to call, visit, argue over a recipe, or listen to a family story for the hundredth time. One conversation can make room for another, but that depends on what we do with it.
Elsa's scene is imagined. The empty hours that make me imagine it, however, are easy to recognize. They were there before these devices arrived. Artificial intelligence is forcing us to look at them and decide what part we want to play ourselves.
So I return to the daughter turning off her phone. She can still leave it on the table and go to sleep reassured. Tomorrow she can call. Ask her mother how the neighbor is doing. Wait for the answer. Share something about her own day, so the conversation can travel both ways.
If there is someone you can make that call to, make it. Even if they already have company. Even if the summary says everything was fine. There are things your voice can say before you have finished the first sentence.
Christian Ruggeri